3 Nov 2005
HKSAR v. LUI CHUN KEUNG
- Citation
- HKSAR v. LUI CHUN KEUNG
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC406/2004
The convictions were upheld because the prosecution evidence was clear and convincing and minor discrepancies did not undermine the credibility of the police witnesses; the applicant's claim of a prior no‑case ruling was a misapprehension and the separate acquittal did not establish framing, therefore the renewed application for leave to appeal was without merit and dismissed, and the court applied s83W CPO to disallow reckoning of three months' custody.