21 Apr 1994
R. v. TAM PING-MAN
- Citation
- R. v. TAM PING-MAN
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC161/1992
Any omission by the trial judge to warn about uncorroborated child evidence was harmless because the conviction was sufficiently supported by other reliable evidence (the co‑accused D3's testimony and appellant's statement); on sentencing a planned ransom kidnapping is within the upper range of seriousness and six years was a proper sentence under the common law charge subject to the s.90 cap.