28 Aug 2007
HKSAR v. LI KWOK HO
- Citation
- HKSAR v. LI KWOK HO
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC253/2006
The Court held that the totality of the circumstantial evidence—registration changes, prompt registration soon after theft, payment to retain and replace the registration number, advertising of surplus engine and seats, lack of credible explanation and dealer status—compelled the irresistible inference that the applicant knew or believed the vehicle was stolen; therefore conviction stands and the four year sentence is not manifestly excessive.