29 May 2012
HKSAR v. JARDIN RODELA MANINGAS
- Citation
- HKSAR v. JARDIN RODELA MANINGAS
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC278/2011
The conviction was upheld because the circumstantial evidence permitted the reasonable inference that the applicant knew the shoes contained heroin; however, the sentencing judge erred by failing to give any credit for the applicant's tangible cooperation in an attempted controlled delivery, warranting reduction of the sentence from 20 to 18 years' imprisonment.