29 Aug 2013
香港特別行政區 訴 張立時
- Citation
- 香港特別行政區 訴 張立時
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA298/2013
The appeal is allowed because the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant knew the memory modules were concealed; the magistrate's inference that only the appellant could have enabled access was not the only reasonable conclusion given other persons' access to the vehicle and absence of direct evidence, and the interview record was of limited probative value.