9 Sept 2022
The Notice of Motion was dismissed because the applicant failed to provide a reasonable explanation for an over five‑month delay and failed to identify any question of great general or public importance under section 22(1)(b) Cap 484 or any other reasonably arguable basis to grant leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal.
18 Sept 2019
Leave to appeal was refused because the statutory criteria in s22(1)(b) Cap.484 were not met: the questions raised were not arguable points of great general or public importance, the applicant offered no adequate basis for delay, and new fact‑sensitive arguments (lack of representation) raised for the first time could not justify granting leave.
26 Oct 2018
The appeal is dismissed and leave to apply for judicial review is refused because the application was out of time with no explanation or s14AA leave sought, the applicants failed to comply with procedural directions, and on the merits there was no arguable error of law or procedural unfairness by the Board; no realistic prospect of success was shown.