28 May 1997
R. v. LUI KAM MING
- Citation
- R. v. LUI KAM MING
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA1532/1996
The appeal was allowed because there was a real doubt whether the appellant was given a full opportunity to cross-examine the prosecution witness on inconsistencies in prior statements, rendering the conviction unsafe; additionally, the magistrate had no power to impose the separate $200 fine for late arrival, so the conviction and both fines were set aside.