14 May 2013
ASPIAL INVESTMENT LTD AND ANOTHER v. MAYER CORPORATION DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL LTD
- Citation
- ASPIAL INVESTMENT LTD AND ANOTHER v. MAYER CORPORATION DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL LTD
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV162/2012
The summons was dismissed because the appellant failed Ladd v Marshall condition 1 (the handwriting reports could with reasonable diligence have been obtained for trial), the reports were produced late causing prejudice by denying respondents time to obtain contrary expert evidence, and procedural non-compliance and the inconclusive nature of the reports weighed against admitting the evidence on appeal.