26 Jul 2013
RE TAM MEI KAM
- Citation
- RE TAM MEI KAM
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV87/2012
Leave to appeal was refused because the appeal was from a bankruptcy order (not the underlying judgment debt) so s.22(1)(a) did not apply; the questions posed were not of great general or public importance under s.22(1)(b); and no miscarriage of justice was established to justify leave.