30 Oct 1991
TIN YING SIN AND OTHERS v. TIN KA PING AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- TIN YING SIN AND OTHERS v. TIN KA PING AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV102/1991
Leave to apply for committal was properly refused because the primary complaint (that the defendants had not caused solicitors to pay the deposited funds to the Registrar) had been resolved—the funds had been paid intact to the Registrar—and therefore pursuing committal would be a sterile and inappropriate exercise; the Deputy Judge's refusal was not shown to be wrong.