7 Nov 2017
羅慧萍 對 陳德仁律師行之陳德仁律師
- Citation
- 羅慧萍 對 陳德仁律師行之陳德仁律師
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ789/2017
There was insufficient clear and cogent evidence that the 12 interim bills were posted to the plaintiff prior to the defendant's deductions; disputed facts must be resolved at trial; on the threshold for striking out the defendant failed to show the claim was plainly unsustainable or bound to fail, therefore the strike-out summons must be vacated and cannot succeed at this interlocutory stage.