9 May 2016
李愛紅 對 威瑪士有限公司及另三人
- Citation
- 李愛紅 對 威瑪士有限公司及另三人
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCPI117/2012
The consent settlement order which specified payment by cheque made out to the plaintiff was legally incapable of being lawfully performed because the Legal Aid Ordinance s19A vests a first charge in the Director and requires payment to be dealt with by the Director; the application to vary under O.20 r.11 was inappropriate because the issue was substantive, not a clerical error, and therefore the entire settlement order dated 3 December 2015 was set aside (vacated).