13 May 2005
TOPPAN PRINTING CO v. CHINESE UNITED PRESS LTD AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- TOPPAN PRINTING CO v. CHINESE UNITED PRESS LTD AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA2898/2002
The October 3 letter was too ambiguous and lacked the requisite certainty and consideration to create a binding contractual obligation on the 2nd defendant; additionally Mr Cheng had no proven board authorisation to commit the company to an unlimited undertaking, therefore the 2nd defendant was not bound to pay the 1st defendant's debt and the claim against it was dismissed.