7 Oct 1988
CHONG HING KAM v. CHING YAU KEUNG t/a JAN CHEONG SING HARDWARE
- Citation
- CHONG HING KAM v. CHING YAU KEUNG t/a JAN CHEONG SING HARDWARE
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV98/1988
The summary procedure under rule 64 was inappropriate because the affirmations disclosed significant disputed issues of fact and law (including potential adverse possession) requiring proper pleadings and oral evidence; the District Court's possession order was therefore set aside and the proceedings were ordered to continue as if begun by writ with particulars to be filed within 14 days.