11 Jun 1984
LO KA CHUN v. LO TO AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- LO KA CHUN v. LO TO AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA2015/1980
Given the Re‑Amended Statement of Claim was, on fair liberal review, highly obscure, contained significant material gaps and inconsistent alternative allegations, and was likely to prejudice, embarrass and delay a fair trial, the court exercised its discretion under O.18 r.19(1)(c) (and inherent jurisdiction) to strike out the pleading; the need for clear, particularised pleading outweighed the lateness of the application.