18 Mar 2009
SONIA YAU AND ANOTHER v. LAU MING YIN
- Citation
- SONIA YAU AND ANOTHER v. LAU MING YIN
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP258/2009
Service by registered post was properly effected and Company Registry and postal evidence established respondent was resident at the service address at the relevant time; respondent produced no credible evidence he was absent or did not receive the documents, his asserted defence lacked credibility and the proposed appeal had no real prospect of success, and there was substantial unexplained delay — therefore extension of time to appeal was refused.