10 Aug 2012
HKSAR v. CHEUNG SZE WAH
- Citation
- HKSAR v. CHEUNG SZE WAH
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC301/2009
Leave to appeal against conviction refused because admissible evidence (account signatory status, merchant agreements, signed cheques, deposit slips, letters and other items found in safes) sufficiently established the applicant's managerial involvement in S3; appeal against sentence allowed in part because the aggregate sentence of 6.5 years was manifestly excessive and should be reduced to reflect proportionality while recognising that the dealing with proceeds offences added culpability given the applicant's ownership and hands-on role.