21 Nov 2013
黃 對 施
- Citation
- 黃 對 施
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP1999/2013
The Court of Appeal held that the trial judge correctly treated equal division as the starting point but legitimately exercised discretion to depart from equality because of the husband's sustained non‑contribution, misconduct and exclusive occupation of the marital home; on that basis the 80:20 split was not legally erroneous and the wife's application for leave to appeal was refused.