2 May 2014
ZIMMER SWEDEN AB v. KPN HONG KONG LTD AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- ZIMMER SWEDEN AB v. KPN HONG KONG LTD AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA2264/2013
Ex‑parte injunctions and gagging order were not obtained by material non-disclosure and should be continued because Zimmer Sweden has a good arguable proprietary/restitutionary claim to the traced funds; it is just and convenient to preserve the assets pending trial; fortification of the cross‑undertaking was refused for lack of cogent evidence of loss and on consideration of plaintiff's financial standing; gagging order continued to prevent tipping off; security for costs ordered (HK$600,000) as a fair balance given foreign plaintiff status.