11 Jun 2013
JOEL KAI THOMAS v. TAO HSIAO SHAN, ALICE
- Citation
- JOEL KAI THOMAS v. TAO HSIAO SHAN, ALICE
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP209/2011
Counsel's answer to the court created a distorted picture by omitting material information (the First Disclosure Date); that omission was material to the risk of dissipation and to the grant of the Mareva injunction; consequently the intended appeal had no reasonable prospect of success and there was no other reason in the interests of justice to hear it, so leave to appeal was refused and the application dismissed with costs.