2 Aug 2005
HKSAR v. CHAN MEI KUEN
- Citation
- HKSAR v. CHAN MEI KUEN
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA214/2005
The warrant was sufficiently specific to identify the premises when read with the room number; s.45 precludes challenging the manner or form of seizure at trial so the seized cigarettes were admissible; precedent (R v Cheung Ka Fai) reinforces that relevant evidence need not be excluded for improper police conduct; the magistrate was entitled to reject DW3's testimony on credibility grounds; therefore conviction must be upheld.