16 Aug 2019
香港特別行政區 訴 陳志滔
- Citation
- [2019] HKCFI 1992
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA608/2018
The trial judge properly refused a permanent stay after assessing delay and available curative directions; evidence of uncharged acts was admissible for context and was limited in use; the judge’s credibility findings were reasonable and entitled to deference; on count 3 even if the act could be not indecent per se, there was sufficient evidence to infer indecent intent beyond reasonable doubt; therefore the convictions on counts 1–3 are safe and must be upheld.