4 Mar 2026
香港特別行政區 訴 陳偉強
- Citation
- [2026] HKCA 367
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC160/2021
The Court held P8A was admissible and, on its proper interpretation, unambiguously supported the prosecution's case that the applicant suggested or referred to HK$200,000 to 'settle' matters so X would not give evidence; alleged deficiencies in trial counsel did not cause a miscarriage of justice because even if the omitted lines of defence had been fully advanced or the applicant had testified the powerful effect of P8A and other evidence would not have been undermined; therefore leave to appeal was refused and the conviction upheld.