29 Oct 2010
ANTWERP DIAMOND BANK N.V. v. GAURANG RAMESH PAYMASTER t/a ROLLING STONE
- Citation
- ANTWERP DIAMOND BANK N.V. v. GAURANG RAMESH PAYMASTER t/a ROLLING STONE
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA2499/2009
Plaintiff had given valuable consideration and was the intended payee named on the invoices; as payee holder for value the plaintiff was not affected by the defendant's personal defences based on the underlying transactions; minor discrepancy in payee name/address did not prevent the plaintiff suing; the defendant's account of returning the diamonds was disbelieved and did not raise a triable defence, so summary judgment and dismissal of the appeal were justified.