19 Jul 2000
HKSAR v. SHUM HING ON GEOFFREY AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- HKSAR v. SHUM HING ON GEOFFREY AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC107/2000
The Court held that the convictions were safe and should be upheld: the trial judge correctly admitted and assessed evidence (including industry witness and accomplices) and exercised his discretion properly; D3's appeal against conviction dismissed; the joint and several compensation order against D2 was quashed because such orders are impermissible; the Applicant's review of sentences was refused despite criticism of leniency because sentences, while at the outer edge, were not manifestly inadequate; restrained funds could not be applied while subject to a restraint order but defendants vol…