8 Jan 2001
Realink Paging Ltd. v. Empire Champion Ltd.
- Citation
- Realink Paging Ltd. v. Empire Champion Ltd.
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ6705/2000
The steps were an unauthorised extension and formed part of what was represented as being let; that representation and the plan were admissible and entitled the plaintiff to withdraw; clause 14 is a valid contractual compensation clause (not a penalty) and entitles plaintiff to refund and equivalent compensation; tenant estoppel did not apply to this provisional agreement; accordingly there was no defence and summary judgment was entered for the plaintiff.