25 Mar 2010
RE LIGHT TIME INVESTMENTS LTD
- Citation
- RE LIGHT TIME INVESTMENTS LTD
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP343/2010
The one‑stage approach is impermissible because it would pre‑empt and defeat the statutory discretion vested in the court by s12A(2); s12A does not permit declarations before the mandatory payment into court under s12A(1). Therefore the court ordered payment into court under s12A(1) with directions for advertisement and a subsequent s12A(2) application after prescribed notice periods.