20 Jan 2021
香港特別行政區 訴 黃淑珍及另一人
- Citation
- [2021] HKCA 94
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC14/2020
Leave to appeal as to conviction was granted for A1 because her grounds were reasonably arguable; A1's sentence appeal was refused because there was no error in principle or manifest excess. For A2, grounds alleging lack of knowledge (grounds 1 and 2) were rejected as not reasonably arguable on the evidence, but grounds 3 and 4 challenging the true nature of the company allowance and its impact on the dishonesty element were sufficiently arguable to grant leave to appeal on those points.