18 Jul 2022
香港特別行政區 訴 洪旭暉
- Citation
- [2022] HKCFI 2108
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA167/2022
The court accepted the appellant's credible sworn evidence that he did not receive the Form 2 notice and that non-receipt resulted from postal misdelivery rather than the appellant's negligence because he had a locked mailbox at his correct address and had reported prior misdeliveries to building management; the lower court imposed an unduly onerous requirement that the appellant escalate complaints to the post office or rent a PO box. Consequently the s3A(1) order for payment was revoked under s3B(1).