11 Mar 2014
WDA ARCHITECTS LTD v. MHS PLANNERS, ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- WDA ARCHITECTS LTD v. MHS PLANNERS, ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCCL43/2007
Leave to re-amend was refused because the proposed new causes of action (breach of warranty of authority, exclusive joint venture/partnership, agreement to work as joint venture partners, Authorised Person agreement, estoppel) were founded on new factual averments that did not appear in, or were not substantially the same as, the facts pleaded in the amended statement of claim; therefore they are time‑barred and not within the Order 20 rule 5 exception.