29 Jan 2014
WISHING STAR LTD v. ETREMA CO LTD AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- WISHING STAR LTD v. ETREMA CO LTD AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA656/2010
The court found the plaintiff demonstrated 'good reasons' under Order 25 rule 1C(5)—the absence was inadvertent by a lay representative after solicitors ceased to act, there was no intentional or contumelious default, the application was within three months and disputed substantive issues merited trial—and therefore the claim was restored subject to specified conditions (undertaking to proceed expeditiously, filing of listing questionnaire, and steps to relist or transfer within 21 days); security for costs was declined but costs of the restoration application were ordered nisi against the pl…