21 Jan 2025
有關劉美施的事宜
- Citation
- [2025] HKCA 89
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV344/2023
The appeal was dismissed because the court found no matter existing at the time of the bankruptcy order that would have rendered the order improper under s33(1)(a): there was no fraud, collusion or gross injustice; the District Court judgment was valid and not properly attacked by strong prima facie evidence; the letters of indemnity created independent liability by the appellant such that she bore legal responsibility for the outstanding fees; her absence at the petition hearing lacked a reasonable and credible explanation and, even if she had attended, she would inevitably have been made ba…