23 Oct 2014
MIMI KAR KEE WONG HUNG v. RAYMOND KIN SANG HUNG
- Citation
- MIMI KAR KEE WONG HUNG v. RAYMOND KIN SANG HUNG
- Court
- Court of Final Appeal
- Case number
- FAMV24/2014
Leave to appeal was granted to both parties on the clawback questions because they raised issues of great general or public importance; however the Court rejected the broadened proposition that any non‑marital expenditure which merely diminishes the matrimonial pot should be added back, affirmed that add‑back requires principled criteria (eg wanton/reckless/extravagant spending), and declined to disturb the trial judge's discretionary decision to adhere to equal division.