22 Jan 2021
香港特別行政區 訴 馮宣明
- Citation
- [2021] HKCFI 100
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA206/2020
The appeal is dismissed because the sentencing judge correctly applied appellate authorities establishing that upskirting is a serious public‑order and privacy offence for which short immediate custody is the appropriate benchmark, the investigative delay was not unreasonable nor unfair and did not warrant mitigation, and the judge properly declined non‑custodial disposal given repeat offending and need for deterrence; the starting point of 21 days reduced to 14 days for plea was lawful and not manifestly excessive.