23 Jun 2021
C v. S
- Citation
- [2021] HKCFI 1662
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP929/2017
The Court held that in light of N's welfare and her present relationship with Father, the Father's proposed access regime was unrealistic and consequently ordered the access terms proposed by Mother (paragraphs 3 to 9 of her draft order), required a non-denigration undertaking by Father if not voluntarily given, directed parties to pursue family therapy with AAFT after the appeal is determined and litigation ceased, and made no order as to costs except that Mother's own costs be taxed under the Legal Aid Regulations.