13 Jan 2025
婁愛琴 對 地政總處處長
- Citation
- [2025] HKCFI 239
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCAL2214/2024
The application for leave was refused because the applicant failed to identify a judicially reviewable decision or legal process, sought to challenge a long-standing 1982 administrative policy which is time-barred under Order 53 r4(1) three-month limit, and provided insufficient evidence to establish an arguable case or prospect of success; accordingly there was no basis for granting interim injunctive relief.