14 Aug 2024
何美儀 對 胡德仁
- Citation
- [2024] HKCFI 2075
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCSA42/2024
The application for leave to appeal is refused because the issues raised are essentially challenges to factual findings that are supported by evidence and therefore not questions of law within s28(1) Cap 338; the unstamped written lease did not preclude proof of the tenancy terms by oral evidence or the implication of repair obligations; there is no arguable legal error or prospect of success on appeal.