4 Jun 2012
王愛琼 對 譚汝珍
- Citation
- 王愛琼 對 譚汝珍
- Court
- Lands Tribunal
- Case number
- LDPD651/2012
The March 8, 2012 notice did not comply with Cap.219 s58(1) because it did not require remediation and allow a reasonable time; the landlord had accepted rent after learning of the subdivision and thus had waived immediate forfeiture; the April 23, 2012 termination notice was ineffective because it was served before the tenant's fixed term had expired and the landlord cannot rely on facts arising after commencement; Land Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to order entry for repairs; on these bases the application for repossession is dismissed and costs reserved as an order nisi.