24 Jul 2019
P v. M
- Citation
- [2019] HKCFI 1864
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCCT6/2019
The court held that the arbitrator exceeded his powers and failed to comply with the scope and procedure of the remission directed by the earlier judgment, resulting in continued serious irregularity and substantial injustice; it was inappropriate to remit again, so paragraphs 169,170,172,174 and 175 of the First Interim Award and paragraphs 15–29 of the Second Interim Award were set aside and declared of no effect, and costs were ordered for P against M.