9 Apr 2021
The defendant's grounds for leave were without a reasonable prospect of success and the mere fact of a pending application to the Court of Appeal does not preclude registration or enforcement; no other grounds of public interest or important legal issue justified a hearing, therefore leave to appeal was refused and the summons vacated.
21 Jan 2005
The earlier mandatory injunction to remove the Defendant's air‑conditioning system was discharged because the Fire Services Department/FEH raised no objection, a site inspection found only a rectifiable sprinkler defect and the Defendant undertook to remedy it, so there was no present fire risk to justify mandatory pre‑trial removal; however, a fresh interlocutory injunction was granted restraining the Defendant from causing further water leakage because evidence showed a serious question to be tried and a risk of irreparable structural damage; the Plaintiff's application for mandatory reinst…