27 Sept 2004
LAM HEI KIT v. HKSAR
- Citation
- LAM HEI KIT v. HKSAR
- Court
- Court of Final Appeal
- Case number
- FAMC27/2004
Leave to appeal was refused because the proposed grounds were not reasonably arguable: it was not reasonably arguable that the s.25 charge was a nullity for lack of specification of the underlying offence, it was not reasonably arguable that the proviso is categorically inapplicable to certain errors, and it was not reasonably arguable that the Court of Appeal departed from accepted norms in applying the proviso.