5 Jul 2002
STEGEMANN R A v. 香港中文大學
- Citation
- STEGEMANN R A v. 香港中文大學
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCLA36/2002
Objective construction of the correspondence against the written appointment letter shows no intention to create a binding collateral contract to renew employment; the correspondence was descriptive and inconsistent with the express one-year term and renewal subject to mutual agreement, therefore no arguable ground of appeal existed and leave to appeal is refused.