27 Mar 2026
香港特別行政區 訴 黃光忠
- Citation
- [2026] HKCFI 1868
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA156/2024
On re‑hearing the High Court found the documentary, photographic and video evidence and witness testimony credible and the appellant's accounts inconsistent and unreliable; cautioned admissions were voluntary and admissible; Housing Department clearance and Fire Services prosecutions were lawful and required no statutory prior notice for prosecution under the cited provisions; self‑defence and related defences were unavailable on the facts; therefore the evidence proved the offences in all four appeals beyond reasonable doubt and the sentences were not manifestly excessive — all appeals dismi…