22 Jul 2013
香港特別行政區 訴 羅家賢
- Citation
- 香港特別行政區 訴 羅家賢
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC285/2012
The 4‑year sentence was excessive because it exceeded the 2.5‑year benchmark for non‑residential burglary by about 60% and the facts did not justify that degree of uplift; although recidivism and offending on bail justified an uplift from the benchmark, the court must exercise restraint and the appropriate sentence was 3 years 3 months imprisonment, concurrent with an existing sentence.