23 Jul 2019
香港特別行政區 訴 黃子琛（又名巫子琛）
- Citation
- [2019] HKCA 823
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC170/2018
Although the trial evidence (opening the door, sole possession of 14 drug units, large cash sum, paraphernalia and presence of many users) could suffice to infer operation and possession for supply in the absence of an explanation, there was a realistic basis to conclude the trial judge's remarks may have misled the applicant into silence and thereby compromised fairness; accordingly leave to appeal against the convictions on counts 1 and 2 was granted (limited to the grounds raised).