18 Jan 2006
LAW SHIU KAI, ANDREW v. DYNASTY INTERNATIONAL HOTEL CORPORATION AND OTHERS
- Citation
- LAW SHIU KAI, ANDREW v. DYNASTY INTERNATIONAL HOTEL CORPORATION AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV49/2004
The application to vacate the appeal hearing dates was dismissed because the plaintiff declined available earlier restoration dates, offered unreasonable grounds amounting to delay, the defendants reasonably refused to jeopardise fixed appeal dates, and an order nisi on costs is not a proper subject of appeal until made absolute.