21 May 2003
COLIN VIVIAN WILLIAMS v. KS CHAN
- Citation
- COLIN VIVIAN WILLIAMS v. KS CHAN
- Court
- Lands Tribunal
- Case number
- LDNT10/2003
Although the CR101 was arguably defective in naming the solicitor as landlord, the applicant had acted upon it (filed CR102/Form 22) thereby removing practical prejudice; the respondent demonstrated a genuine reasonable requirement for the premises under s119E(1)(b); the repealed s35(1) balancing test was inapplicable; result: tenancy terminated and possession and new tenancy terms ordered including acceptance of proposed rent of 20,500 HKD per month.