17 Feb 2012
顧明 對 南方大廈業主立案法團
- Citation
- 顧明 對 南方大廈業主立案法團
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP2638/2011
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant failed to show any error of fact or a reasonable prospect of success: the source of ingress was not proven to be the external wall, the applicant refused access for inspection and expert testing thereby preventing proof of causation, the respondent had taken reasonable steps and complied with s18(1), and the proposed additional evidence/witnesses would not alter the outcome.