21 Feb 2011
KINGCITY INVESTMENT LTD v. SPRING VICTORY LTD AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- KINGCITY INVESTMENT LTD v. SPRING VICTORY LTD AND ANOTHER
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ561/2009
The court found the owners' 16/11/99 agreement allocated both the numbered car parking spaces and their adjacent 'Reserved Areas' according to the agreed ratio; Plan B enlarged Spring Victory's allocated Reserved Areas at Kingcity's expense and thus deviated from the owners' agreement; Kingcity did not validly consent to that change but LLT was not liable because it had discharged its duty to inform by openly copying approvals and documents and the change was objectively patent; consequence: Spring Victory must transfer the disputed CPS No.17 and Reserved Areas 17a and 17b to Kingcity or pay…