22 Jan 2024
BRUCE JAMES STINSON v. GU MING GAO AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- [2024] HKCFI 171
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA851/2018
The summons for further specific discovery was largely dismissed because most documents sought were already covered by the 2014 discovery order or P had sworn on oath that he did not possess them and Ds failed to satisfy the three pre-requisites for specific discovery; only in respect of the HSBC joint account (622-0556550-001) did the court find a prima facie case and order limited discovery (affidavit and production of statements for 27 January 2004 to 27 July 2012). P's sworn statements are conclusive absent contradiction by documents or admissions. Costs order nisi made in favour of P (Ds…